In a nutshell, this is why ID should not be considered as anything but religious...
If ID really were a scientific theory, positive evidence for it, gathered through research, would fill peer-reviewed scientific journals. This doesn't happen. It isn't that editors refuse to publish ID research. There simply isn't any ID research to publish. Its advocates bypass normal scientific due process by appealing directly to the non-scientific public and - with great shrewdness - to the government officials they elect.
Period.
Friday, May 2, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(49)
-
▼
May
(22)
- Who do you trust?
- Latest Letter-to-the-Editor
- Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator
- Thanks God
- The Ten Commandments
- Stuff God Hates
- American Atheists
- Pity
- Obama and Religion
- What does this show you?
- More Pedophile Priests
- Einstein's Letter
- Another one bites the dust...
- Boy Scout Bigotry
- Dumbass Floridians
- Pray for me
- I Agree with Mr. Hitchens
- Only God can make a tree
- But...what about the dog?
- 7th Commandment
- Ben Stein's Intelligent Design (yes, it rhymes)
- Thank The Lord and Pass The Tornado
-
▼
May
(22)
No comments:
Post a Comment